Legislature(2011 - 2012)
2012-04-14 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2012-04-14 House Journal Page 2449 SB 210 Representative Johnson gave notice of reconsideration of the vote on HCS CSSB 210(JUD) (page 2423). Representative Johnson moved and asked unanimous consent that reconsideration of HCS CSSB 210(JUD) be taken up on the same day. There being no objection, it was so ordered. The following was again before the House in third reading: HOUSE CS FOR CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 210(JUD) "An Act relating to crimes against children; relating to persons found guilty but mentally ill; relating to sentencing procedures for factors that may increase the presumptive range or affect 2012-04-14 House Journal Page 2450 mandatory parole eligibility; relating to the granting of probation; relating to procedures for finding aggravating factors at sentencing; relating to crimes of human trafficking; establishing a task force to evaluate services available to victims of human trafficking, sex trafficking, or promotion of prostitution and examine the prevalence of those crimes; relating to the recommendations and report of the task force; amending Rule 32.1, Alaska Rules of Criminal Procedure; and providing for an effective date." The question to be reconsidered: "Shall HCS CSSB 210(JUD) pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: HCS CSSB 210(JUD) Third Reading Final Passage Reconsideration YEAS: 39 NAYS: 0 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 VACANT: 1 Yeas: Austerman, Chenault, Cissna, Costello, Dick, Doogan, Edgmon, Fairclough, Feige, Foster, Gara, Gardner, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Hawker, Herron, Holmes, Johansen, Johnson, Joule, Kawasaki, Keller, Kerttula, Lynn, Miller, Millett, Munoz, Neuman, Olson, Petersen, Pruitt, Saddler, Seaton, Stoltze, Thomas, Thompson, Tuck, P.Wilson, T.Wilson And so, HCS CSSB 210(JUD) passed the House on reconsideration. Representative Austerman moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the court rule change. There being no objection, it was so ordered. Representative Austerman moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the effective date clause. There being no objection, it was so ordered. HCS CSSB 210(JUD) was referred to the Chief Clerk for engrossment.